Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
COCHLEAR IMPLANTS AND TELEPHONE USE:
PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT IN ADULT PATIENTS
1
ENT Department, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Coimbra, Coimbra, Portugal
Publication date: 2015-03-31
Corresponding author
Jorge Humberto Martins
Jorge Humberto Ferreira Martins, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, Quinta dos Vales – S. Martinho do Bispo, Apartado 7005, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal,e-mail: aud.jorgehumberto@gmail.com
Jorge Humberto Ferreira Martins, Centro Hospitalar de Coimbra, Quinta dos Vales – S. Martinho do Bispo, Apartado 7005, 3041-853 Coimbra, Portugal,e-mail: aud.jorgehumberto@gmail.com
J Hear Sci 2015;5(1):31-37
KEYWORDS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Using the telephone for everyday communication and social interaction allows the profoundly deaf patient who uses a cochlear implant to increase their independence and self-esteem. Being able to use the telephone presupposes the ability to perceive speech without the aid of lipreading or any other visual cue.
Objective:
This paper aims to evaluate speech perception performance through the telephone in adult users of cochlear implants
Study sample:
200 adult patients who had used a cochlear implant for a minimum of 1 year were evaluated with speech perception tests (words and sentences) in free-field and through the telephone. They were divided into two groups: group I, composed of individuals who used the telephone in everyday life, and group II, individuals who did not use it.
Results:
The results showed statistically significant differences in free-field tonal and vocal thresholds between both groups, with better performance from group I. When the speech perception test results in free-field and through the telephone were compared, for both groups the performance was better in free-field.
Conclusions:
The results showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, with better performance from group I in all tests.
Using the telephone for everyday communication and social interaction allows the profoundly deaf patient who uses a cochlear implant to increase their independence and self-esteem. Being able to use the telephone presupposes the ability to perceive speech without the aid of lipreading or any other visual cue.
Objective:
This paper aims to evaluate speech perception performance through the telephone in adult users of cochlear implants
Study sample:
200 adult patients who had used a cochlear implant for a minimum of 1 year were evaluated with speech perception tests (words and sentences) in free-field and through the telephone. They were divided into two groups: group I, composed of individuals who used the telephone in everyday life, and group II, individuals who did not use it.
Results:
The results showed statistically significant differences in free-field tonal and vocal thresholds between both groups, with better performance from group I. When the speech perception test results in free-field and through the telephone were compared, for both groups the performance was better in free-field.
Conclusions:
The results showed a statistically significant difference between the two groups, with better performance from group I in all tests.
REFERENCES (15)
1.
Brown AM, Clark GM, Martin RC, Seligman PM. Telephone use by a multi-channel cochlear implant patient: an evaluation using open-set CID sentences. J Laryngol Otol, 1985; 99: 231–8.
2.
Anderson I, Baumgartner WD, Böheim K, Nahler C, Arnolder C et al. Telephone use: what benefit do cochlear implant users receive? Int J Audiol, 2006; 45(8): 446–53.
3.
Tait M, Nikolopoulos T, Archbold S, O’Donoghue G. Use of the telephone in prelingually deaf children with a multichannel cochlear implant. Otol Neurotol, 2001; 22: 47–52.
4.
Calvo A, Atienza L, Marti M, Carrillo C, Sarriá Lucas MJ et al. El uso del teléfono en pacientes con implante coclear. Rev Logop Foniat Aud, 2004; 24(3): 132–6.
5.
Adams JS, Hasenstab MS, Pippin GW, Sismanis A. Telephone use and understanding in patients with cochlear implants, ENT – Ear Nose Throat Journal, 2004; 83(2): 96–103.
6.
Ito J, Nakate M, Fijita S. Hearing ability by telephone of patients with cochlear implants. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 1999; 121: 802–4.
7.
Giles EC. An outline of telephone training procedures at the Manchester Cochlear Implant Center. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES (eds.), Advances in Cochlear Implants. Vienna: Manz, 1994; 604–8.
8.
Pedley K, Giles E, Hogan A. Adult Cochlear Implant Rehabilitation. London: Whurr, 2005.
9.
Cohen N, Waltzman S, Shapiro WH. Telephone speech comprehension with use of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol, 1989; 98: 8–11.
10.
Dorman M, Dove H, Parkin J, Zacharchuk S, Dankowski K. Telephone use by patients fitted with the Ineraid cochlear implant. Ear and Hearing, 1991; 12(5): 368–9.
11.
Cray J, Allen R, Stuart A, Hudson S, Layman E et al: An investigation of telephone usage among cochlear implant recipients. Am J Audiol, 2004; 13: 200–12.
12.
Wieker N, Tearney L. A cochlear implant user’s guide to assistive device and telephones. Hearing J, 2004; 57(11): 20–6.
13.
Martins JH, Januário J, Alves M, Ramos D, Alves H et al. Comparative study of words and sentences discrimination: free field and through telephone in cochlear implant patients. Rev Portuguesa Otorrino, 2010; 48(4): 181–9.
14.
Clinkard D, Shipp D, Friesen L, Stewart S, Ostroff J, Chen J et al. Telephone use and the factors influencing it among cochlear implant patients. Cochlear Implants International, 2001; 12 (3): 140–6.
15.
Martins JH, Januário J, Alves M, Ramos D, Alves H et al. Validation list of monosyllables, numbers and sentences for speech audiometry for adults. Clin Inv Otorrinolaryngologia, 2009; 3(1): 54–59.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
