CASE STUDY
EFFECTIVENESS OF THE ADHEAR BONE CONDUCTION DEVICE FITTED BILATERALLY IN A CHILD WITH CONDUCTIVE HEARING LOSS: CASE STUDY
More details
Hide details
1
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Surgery Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
2
Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
3
Institute of Sensory Organs, Kajetany, Poland
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2024-02-08
Final revision date: 2024-06-17
Acceptance date: 2024-07-01
Publication date: 2024-09-05
Corresponding author
Piotr H. Skarzynski
Department of Teleaudiology and Screening, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042 Warsaw, Poland
J Hear Sci 2024;14(3):51-56
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Frequently, bone conduction hearing aids on a softband are not tolerated by children due to pressure on the head or visual esthetics. By way of contrast, a non-surgical hearing system – Adhear (Med-El, Innsbruck, Austria) – allows the sound processor to be attached using a noninvasive adhesive adapter. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of the Adhear system and assess its subjective benefits in a child who had bilateral conductive hearing loss.
Case report:
The Adhear system was tested in a 13-year-old child with bilateral conductive hearing loss. Pure tone audiometry and speech audiometry in quiet were performed without and then with a pair of devices placed bilaterally. Word recognition scores (WRS) at 50 and 65 dB SPL in quiet were measured using the Pruszewicz monosyllabic Polish word test. After 4 weeks, subjective hearing benefit and experience with the Adhear system was done using the APHAB (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit) questionnaire.
Results:
With Adhear, WRS at 50 dB SPL increased significantly from an unaided score of 10% to 80%. The result of free-field audiometry with Adhear on both sides indicated a hearing level within the normal range.
Conclusions:
Adhear is an effective rehabilitation option for children with bilateral conductive hearing loss.
REFERENCES (22)
1.
Canale A, Favero E, Lacilla M, Recchia E, Schindler A, Roggero N, et al. Age at diagnosis of deaf babies: a retrospective analysis highlighting the advantage of newborn hearing screening. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2006; 70(7): 1283–9.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
3.
Findlen UM, Malhotra PS, Adunka OF. Parent perspectives on multidisciplinary pediatric hearing healthcare. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2019; 116: 141–6.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
4.
Cywka KB, Król B, Skarzynski PH. Effectiveness of bone conduction hearing aids in young children with congenital aural atresia and microtia. Med Sci Monit, 2021; 27: e933915.
https://doi.org/10.12659/MSM.9....
5.
McDermott A-L, Dutt SN, Tziambazis E, Reid AP, Proops DW. Disability, handicap and benefit analysis with the boneanchored hearing aid: the Glasgow hearing aid benefit and difference profiles. J Laryngol Otol Suppl, 2002; 28: 29–36.
https://doi.org/10.1258/002221....
6.
Håkansson BE, Carlsson PU, Tjellström A, Lidén G. The boneanchored hearing aid: principal design and audiometric results. Ear Nose Throat J, 1994; 73(9): 670–5.
7.
Skarzynski PH, Ratuszniak A, Osinska K, Koziel M, Król B, Cywka KB, et al. A comparative study of a novel adhesive bone conduction device and conventional treatment options for conductive hearing loss. Otol Neurotol, 2019; 40(7): 858–64.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.00....
8.
Zernotti ME, Alvarado E, Zernotti M, Claveria N, Di Gregorio MF. One-year follow-up in children with conductive hearing loss using ADHEAR. Audiol Neurootol, 2021; 26(6): 435–44.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000514....
9.
Westerkull P. An adhesive bone conduction system, Adhear, a new treatment option for conductive hearing losses. J Hear Sci, 2018; 8(2): 35–43.
https://doi.org/10.17430/10030....
10.
Mertens G, Gilles A, Bouzegta R, Van de Heyning P. A prospective randomized crossover study in single sided deafness on the new non-invasive adhesive bone conduction hearing system. Otol Neurotol, 2018; 39(8): 940–9.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.00....
11.
Roman S, Nicollas R, Triglia J-M. Practice guidelines for boneanchored hearing aids in children. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis, 2011; 128(5): 253–8.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anor....
12.
Stevenson J, McCann D, Watkin P, Worsfold S, Kennedy C, Hearing Outcomes Study Team. The relationship between language development and behaviour problems in children with hearing loss. J Child Psychol Psychiatry, 2010; 51(1): 77–83.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469....
13.
Kittelfors M, Mattsson E. Subjective and objective comparison between two bone conductor hearing system, Softband and Adjoin. July 2015 [in Swedish]. Available from:
https://core.ac.uk/works/25201... [Accessed 22.07.2024].
14.
Neumann K, Thomas JP, Voelter C, Dazert S. A new adhesive bone conduction hearing system effectively treats conductive hearing loss in children. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2019; 122: 117–25.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
15.
Dahm V, Baumgartner W-D, Liepins R, Arnoldner C, Riss D. First results with a new, pressure-free, adhesive bone conduction hearing aid. Otol Neurotol, 2018; 39(6): 748–54.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.00....
16.
Urík M, Šikolová S, Hošnová D, Kruntorád V, Bartoš M. Improvement in quality of life comparing noninvasive versus invasive hearing rehabilitation in children. Laryngoscope Investig Otolaryngol, 2023; 8(2): 591–8.
https://doi.org/10.1002/lio2.1....
17.
Liu Y, Wang Y, Yang L, Zhu J, Wang D, Zhao S. Bilateral adhesive bone conduction devices in patients with congenital bilateral conductive hearing loss. Am J Otolaryngol, 2023; 44(4): 103923.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amjo....
18.
Favoreel A, Heuninck E, Mansbach A-L. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction of children with the ADHEAR audio processor and adhesive adapter. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2020; 129: 109729.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpo....
19.
Hirth D, Weiss R, Stöver T, Kramer S. Audiological benefit and subjective satisfaction with the ADHEAR hearing system in children with unilateral conductive hearing loss. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021; 278(8): 2781–8.
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405....
20.
Liu Y, Chen P, Yang L, Zhu J, Yang J, Wang D, et al. Optimal choice for improving the hearing in children with unilateral microtia and atresia: softband or adhesive adapter? Audiol Neurootol, 2023; 28(2): 128–37.
https://doi.org/10.1159/000526....
21.
Muzzi E, Gambacorta V, Lapenna R, Pizzamiglio G, Ghiselli S, Caregnato I, Marchi R, et al. Audiological performance of ADHEAR systems in simulated conductive hearing loss: a case series with a review of the existing literature. Audiol Res, 2021; 11(4): 537–46.
https://doi.org/10.3390/audiol....
22.
Osborne MS, Child-Hymas A, Gill J, Lloyd MS, McDermott AL. First pediatric experience with a novel, adhesive adapter retained, bone conduction hearing aid system. Otol Neurotol, 2019; 40(9): 1199–207.
https://doi.org/10.1097/MAO.00....