Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
HEARING THRESHOLDS OF OTOLOGICALLY HEALTHY
18-YEAR-OLDS
1
Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical
Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
2
Department of Epidemiology, Biostatistics and HTA, Radboud University, Nijmegen Medical Centre,
Nijmegen, The Netherlands
Publication date: 2011-06-30
J Hear Sci 2011;1(2):27-34
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Objective:
To determine mean hearing thresholds for 18-year-old, otologically healthy subjects
Study design:
Prospective historical cohort study
Methods:
As part of a follow-up study of a birth cohort, followed from age 2 to 18 years, meticulous otological examination including history-taking, otoscopy, and audiometry were available. At age 18, both air-conduction thresholds (0.25 kHz to 8 kHz and 8 kHz to 16 kHz) and bone-conduction thresholds (0.5 kHz to 4 kHz) were measured. Subjects of this cohort were defined as otologically healthy if they had not experienced substantial otitis media in childhood.
Results:
On both ends of the frequency range of air-conduction testing, measured thresholds deviated statistically significantly from the ISO 389 reference zero. The air-conduction thresholds were comparable to data presented in the literature. Furthermore, a misfit with the ISO 389 reference was found at 2 and 3 kHz for bone-conduction testing. Only the mean boneconduction thresholds at 0.5 kHz and 4 kHz were not significantly different from the ISO 389 reference zero. To explain the deviations at high frequencies, noise exposure was considered but thought unlikely
Conclusions:
This study cohort seems to be the best representative sample so far of otologically healthy subjects due to the longitudinal study of their otological status. Mean hearing thresholds at age 18 are different from the ISO 389 reference zero, suggesting once more the need to revise this ISO norm.
To determine mean hearing thresholds for 18-year-old, otologically healthy subjects
Study design:
Prospective historical cohort study
Methods:
As part of a follow-up study of a birth cohort, followed from age 2 to 18 years, meticulous otological examination including history-taking, otoscopy, and audiometry were available. At age 18, both air-conduction thresholds (0.25 kHz to 8 kHz and 8 kHz to 16 kHz) and bone-conduction thresholds (0.5 kHz to 4 kHz) were measured. Subjects of this cohort were defined as otologically healthy if they had not experienced substantial otitis media in childhood.
Results:
On both ends of the frequency range of air-conduction testing, measured thresholds deviated statistically significantly from the ISO 389 reference zero. The air-conduction thresholds were comparable to data presented in the literature. Furthermore, a misfit with the ISO 389 reference was found at 2 and 3 kHz for bone-conduction testing. Only the mean boneconduction thresholds at 0.5 kHz and 4 kHz were not significantly different from the ISO 389 reference zero. To explain the deviations at high frequencies, noise exposure was considered but thought unlikely
Conclusions:
This study cohort seems to be the best representative sample so far of otologically healthy subjects due to the longitudinal study of their otological status. Mean hearing thresholds at age 18 are different from the ISO 389 reference zero, suggesting once more the need to revise this ISO norm.
FUNDING
The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development provided financial support for this
study (ZonMW project no. 21000053)
REFERENCES (19)
1.
Axelsson A, Rosenhall U, Zachau G: Hearing in 18-year-old Swedish males. Scand Audiol, 1994; 23: 129–34.
2.
Barry SJ: Can bone conduction thresholds really be poorer than air? Am J Audiol, 1994; 3: 21–22.
3.
Buren M, Solem BS, Laukli E: Threshold of hearing (0.125–20 kHz) in children and youngsters. Br J Audiol, 1992; 26: 23–31.
4.
de Beer BA, Graamans K, Snik AF et al: Hearing deficits in young adults who had a history of otitis media in childhood: use of personal stereos had no effect on hearing. Pediatrics, 2003; 111: e304–8.
5.
Frank T: High-frequency hearing thresholds in young adults using a commercially available audiometer. Ear Hear, 1990; 11: 450–54.
6.
ISO 389-1. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1998.
7.
ISO 389-2. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 2: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and insert earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1994.
8.
ISO 389-3. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 3: Reference equivalent threshold force levels for pure tones and bone vibrators. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1994.
9.
ISO 389R. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 1: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones and supra-aural earphones. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1964.
10.
ISO 8253-1. Acoustics. Audiometric test methods. Part 1: Basic pure tone air and bone conduction threshold audiometry. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1989.
11.
ISO/TR 389-5. Acoustics. Reference zero for the calibration of audiometric equipment. Part 5: Reference equivalent threshold sound pressure levels for pure tones in the frequency range 8 kHz to 16 kHz. Geneva, Switzerland: International Organization of Standardization, 1998.
12.
Lightfoot GR, Hughes JB: Bone conduction errors at high frequencies: implications for clinical and medico-legal practice. J Laryngol Otol, 1993; 107: 305–8.
13.
Lutman ME, Davis AC: The distribution of hearing threshold levels in the general population aged 18–30 years. Audiology, 1994; 33: 327–50.
14.
Rahko-Laitila P, Karma P, Laippala P et al: The pure-tone hearing thresholds of otologically healthy 14-year-old children. Audiology, 2001; 40: 171–77.
15.
Schilder AGM, Zielhuis GA, Haggard MP, van den Broek P: Long-term effects of otitis media with effusion: otomicroscopic findings. Am J Otol, 1995; 16: 365–72.
16.
Smith P, Davis A, Ferguson M, Lutman M: Hearing in Young Adults: Report to ISO/TC43/WG1. Noise Health, 1999; 1: 1–10.
17.
Stelmachowicz PG, Beauchaine KA, Kalberer A et al: Highfrequency audiometry: test reliability and procedural considerations. J Acoust Soc Am, 1989; 85: 879–87.
18.
Valente M, Potts LG, Valente M et al: High-frequency thresholds: sound suite versus hospital room. J Am Acad Audiol, 1992; 3: 287–94.
19.
Zielhuis GA, Rach GH, van den Broek P: Screening for otitis media with effusion in preschool children. Lancet, 1989; 1: 311–14.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
