ORIGINAL ARTICLE
HOW AN ARRAY OF DISCRETE RESONATORS, COUPLED BY FLUID, CAN REPRODUCE THE DYNAMICS OF CLICK-EVOKED OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS
Hero Piet Wit 1, A,D-F
 
 
 
More details
Hide details
1
Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Groningen,The Netherlands. University of Groningen, Graduate School of Medical Sciences (Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences), Groningen, The Netherlands, Netherlands
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
 
 
Publication date: 2021-03-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Hero Piet Wit   

Otolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Otorhinolaryngology/Head and Neck Surgery, Groningen,The Netherlands. University of Groningen, Graduate School of Medical Sciences (Research School of Behavioural and Cognitive Neurosciences), Groningen, The Netherlands, Hanzeplein 1, 9700RB, Groningen, Netherlands
 
 
J Hear Sci 2021;11(1):54-62
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
This paper describes a basic representation of cochlear mechanics. To represent the cochlear partition, we begin with an array of discrete tuned resonators, immersed in fluid. The resonators are stimulated by an impulse from another resonator, which is taken to be the middle ear. A “state space” representation of the classic transmission line model is used to describe the multiple fluid-borne interactions which take place between all the resonators. The overall response seen at the middle ear looks remarkably similar to a click-evoked otoacoustic emission (CEOAE) if the place–frequency map of the cochlea contains tuning irregularities. The paper describes, step by step, how the CEOAEs are generated. We show that impulse responses from each oscillator are transported back to the ear canal, and that these responses add up to create a standing wave pattern in the fluid pressure. This standing wave is the sum of waves repeatedly travelling back and forth between an irregularity and oscillator 1. If only one irregularity is present, the impulse response of oscillator 1 (the “stimulus”) is followed by a weak single oscillation, with the characteristics of a “gammachirp”. If irregularities are present all along the cochlear partition, many gammachirps add up to produce a signal with similar characteristics as a CEOAE measured in a normal hearing ear. The model therefore describes the generation of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions.
 
REFERENCES (30)
1.
Kemp DT. Active resonance systems in audition. 13th International Congress of Audiology, Bari, Italy, 1976; Abstracts 64–5.
 
2.
Kemp DT. Stimulated acoustic emissions from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 1978; 64: 1386–91.
 
3.
Wit HP, Ritsma RJ. Stimulated emissions from the human ear. J Acoust Soc Am, 1979; 66: 911–13.
 
4.
Wit HP, Ritsma RJ. Evoked responses from the human ear: Some experimental results. Hear Res, 1980: 2: 253–61.
 
5.
Rutten WLC. Evoked acoustic emissions from within normal and abnormal human ears: comparison with audiometric and electrocochleographic findings. Hear Res, 1980; 2: 263–71.
 
6.
Schloth E. Amplitudengang der im äuszeren Gehörgang gemessenen akustischen Antworten auf Schallreize. Acustica, 1980; 44: 239–41.
 
7.
Wilson JP. Evidence for cochlear origin for acoustic re-emissions, threshold fine-structure and tonal tinnitus. Hear Res, 1980; 2: 233–52.
 
8.
Probst R, Lonsbury-Martin BL, Martin GK. A review of otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1991; 89: 2027–67.
 
9.
Kemp DT. Otoacoustic emissions, their origin in cochlear function, and use. Brit Med Bull, 2002; 63: 223–41.
 
10.
Kemp DT, Chum R. Properties of the generator of stimulated acoustic emissions. Hear Res, 1980: 2: 213–32.
 
11.
McFadden D, Loehlin JC, Pasanen, EG. Additional findings on heritability and prenatal masculinization of cochlear mechanisms: click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 1996:97:102–19.
 
12.
Zweig G, Shera CA. The origin of periodicity in the spectrum of evoked otoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1995; 98: 2018–47.
 
13.
Wit HP, van Dijk P, Avan P. Wavelet analysis of real ear and synthesized click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 1994; 73: 141–7.
 
14.
Wit HP, van Dijk P, Avan P. On the shape of (evoked) otoacoustic emission spectra. Hear Res, 1994; 81: 208–14.
 
15.
Gold T. Hearing II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc Roy Soc B, 1948; 135: 492–8.
 
16.
Gold T. Historical background to the proposal, 40 years ago, of an active model for cochlear frequency analysis. In: JP Wilson, DT Kemp (eds). Cochlear mechanisms, structure, function and models. Plenum Press, New York, 1988: 299–305.
 
17.
Sutton GJ, Wilson JP. Modelling cochlear echoes: the influence of irregularities in frequency mapping and summed cochlear activity. In: E de Boer, MA Viergever (eds) Mechanics of Hearing. Delft University Press, Delft, 1983: 83–90.
 
18.
Bogert BP. Determination of the effects of dissipation in the cochlear partition by means of a network representing the basilar membrane. J Acoust. Soc. Am, 1951; 23: 151–4.
 
19.
Duifhuis H. Cochlear Mechanics: An introduction to time domain analysis of the nonlinear cochlea. Springer, 2012.
 
20.
Moleti A, Al-Maamury AM, Bertacci D, Botti T, Sisto, R. Generation of the long- and short-latency components of transientevoked otoacoustic emissions in a nonlinear cochlear model. J Acoust Soc Am, 2013; 133: 4098–108.
 
21.
Laubenbacher R, Pareigis B. Equivalence relations on finite dynamical systems. Adv Appl Math, 2001; 26(3): 237–51.
 
22.
Elliott SJ, Ku EM, Lineton B. A state space model for cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am, 2007; 122: 2759–71.
 
23.
Elliott SJ, Lineton B, Ni G. Fluid coupling in a discrete model of cochlear mechanics. J Acoust Soc Am, 2011; 130: 1441–51.
 
24.
Elliott SJ, Ni G. An elemental approach to modelling the mechanics of the cochlea. Hear Res, 2018; 360: 14–24.
 
25.
Geven LI, Wit HP, de Kleine E, van Dijk P. Wavelet analysis demonstrates no abnormality in contralateral suppression of otoacoustic emissions in tinnitus patients. Hear Res, 2012; 286: 30–40.
 
26.
Jedrzejczak WW, Bell A, Skarzynski PH, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. Time–frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artefact. J Acoust Soc Am, 2012; 131: 2200–8.
 
27.
Fruth F, Jülicher F, Lindner B. An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Biophys J, 2014; 107: 815–24.
 
28.
De Boer E, Nuttall AL. The mechanical waveform of the basilar membrane. I. Frequency modulations (“glides”) in impulse responses and cross-correlation functions. J Acoust Soc Am, 1997; 101: 3583–92.
 
29.
Shera CA. Frequency glides in click responses of the basilar membrane and auditory nerve: their scaling behavior and origin in travelling wave dispersion. J Acoust Soc Am, 2001; 109: 2023–34.
 
30.
Irino T, Patterson RP. A time-domain, level-dependent auditory filter: the gammachirp. J Acoust Soc Am, 1997; 101: 412–9.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top