Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
INDO-SPRITT: DEVELOPMENT AND NORMS OF AN INDONESIAN SPEECH RECOGNITION THRESHOLD TEST FOR CHILDREN
1
Department of Linguistic, Macquarie University, Australia
2
NextSense Institute, NextSense, Australia
3
Manchester Centre for Audiology and Deafness, University of Manchester, United Kingdom
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2022-03-13
Final revision date: 2022-08-30
Acceptance date: 2022-11-15
Online publication date: 2022-12-29
Publication date: 2022-12-29
Corresponding author
Dahlia Sartika Eka Sartika
Department of Linguistic, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, 2109, Macquarie Park NSW, Australia
Department of Linguistic, Macquarie University, Balaclava Rd, 2109, Macquarie Park NSW, Australia
J Hear Sci 2022;12(4):55-67
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Well-designed audiometric speech tests for Indonesian children are not currently available. This paper describes the development of the Indonesian Speech Recognition Threshold Test (INDO-SPRITT).
Material and methods:
A list of Indonesian words with response foils and pictures was developed. Presentation level was varied and the 50% recognition threshold was calculated as the average of the midpoints of each reversal. A normative reference was established using a sample of 118 normal hearing participants,16 children with severe to profound hearing loss, and 25 adults. The effects of age on speech reception thresholds and test reliability were also assessed.
Results:
INDO-SPRITT material was found to be appropriate for children older than 4 years and 6 months. The speech reception threshold (SRT) improved on average from 18 dB HL for 4 to 5 year old children to 13 dB for children aged 10 to 13 years, providing a normative reference against which the SRT of children with unknown hearing status can be compared. Five reversals are enough to estimate the SRT.
Conclusions:
Suitable words, phonemic balance, and pictures have been created for Indonesian children. The reliability of different lengths of the test was similar, with 5 reversals being enough to estimate the SRT. The mean SRT decreased with age, but did not vary with the number of reversals.
Well-designed audiometric speech tests for Indonesian children are not currently available. This paper describes the development of the Indonesian Speech Recognition Threshold Test (INDO-SPRITT).
Material and methods:
A list of Indonesian words with response foils and pictures was developed. Presentation level was varied and the 50% recognition threshold was calculated as the average of the midpoints of each reversal. A normative reference was established using a sample of 118 normal hearing participants,16 children with severe to profound hearing loss, and 25 adults. The effects of age on speech reception thresholds and test reliability were also assessed.
Results:
INDO-SPRITT material was found to be appropriate for children older than 4 years and 6 months. The speech reception threshold (SRT) improved on average from 18 dB HL for 4 to 5 year old children to 13 dB for children aged 10 to 13 years, providing a normative reference against which the SRT of children with unknown hearing status can be compared. Five reversals are enough to estimate the SRT.
Conclusions:
Suitable words, phonemic balance, and pictures have been created for Indonesian children. The reliability of different lengths of the test was similar, with 5 reversals being enough to estimate the SRT. The mean SRT decreased with age, but did not vary with the number of reversals.
REFERENCES (28)
1.
Soewito A, Djoko SS, Soejarno AH. Pembakuan Tes Bisik Kata bisilabik Bahasa. Yogyakarta: Universitas Gajah Mada; 1984.
2.
Markides A. Speech tests of hearing for children. In: Martin M, editor. Speech Audiometry. London: Taylor & Francis; 1987, 155–70.
3.
Stach BA. Speech Audiometry. In: Stach BA, editor. Clinical Audiology: An Introduction. San Diego: Singular;1998, 229–52.
6.
Grimes CE. Indonesian: the official language of a multilingual nation. In: Wurm SA, Muhlhausler P, Tyron DT, editors. Atlas of Languages of Intercultural Communication in the Pacific, Asia, and the Americas (Trends in Linguistics. Documentation 13). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter; 1996, 719–27.
7.
Lapoliwa H. A generative approach to the phonology of Bahasa Indonesia. Canberra: Department of Linguistics, Research School of Pacific Studies, Australian National University; 1981.
8.
Soderberg CD, Olson KS. Indonesian. Journal of the International Phonetic Association: Illustrations of the IPA, 2008; 38(2): 209–13.
9.
Jerger S. Speech Audiometry. In: Jerger J, editor. Pediatric Audiology. San Diego: College Hill Press; 1984.
10.
Kirk KI, Diendorf AO, Pisoni DB, Robbins AM. Assessing speech perception in children. In: Mendel LL, Danhauer JL, editors. Audiologic Evaluation and Management and Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular; 1997, 101–31.
11.
Mendel LL, Pousson MA, Bass JK, Coffelt JA, Morris M, Lane KA. Spanish Picture Identification Test. Am J Audiol, 2020; 29(3): 318–28.
12.
Kendall DC. Audiometry for young children. The Teacher of the Deaf, 1954; LII/52(307), 18–23.
13.
Mendel LL, Pousson MA, Bass JK, Lunsford RE, McNiece C. Spanish Pediatric Speech Recognition Threshold (SPSRT) Test. Am J Audiol, 2019; 28(3): 597–604.
14.
Elliot LL, Katz DR. Development of a New Children’s Test of Speech Discrimination. St Louis: Auditec; 1980.
15.
Doyne MP, Steer MD. Studies in speech reception testing. J Speech Hear Disord, 1951; 16(2): 132–9.
16.
Soli SD. Some thoughts on communication handicap and hearing impairment. Int J Audiol, 2008; 47(6): 285–6.
17.
Bradley J, Lancashire I, Presutti L, Stairs M. Text Analysis Computing Tools (TACT), version 2.1.4; 1995.
18.
Dillon H, Ching T. What makes a good speech test? In: Plant G, Spens KE, editors. Profound Deafness and Speech Communication. London: Whurr Publishers; 1995.
19.
Black JW. Responses to multiple-choice intelligibility tests. J Speech Hear Res, 1968; 11: 453–66.
20.
Mackie K, Dermody P. Use of a monosyllabic adaptive speech test (MAST) with young children. J Speech Hear Res, 1986; 29(2): 275–81.
21.
Mackie KC, Dermody PJ. Word intelligibility tests in audiology for the assessment of communication adequacy. Canberra: National Acoustic Laboratories (Australia); 1982.
22.
Wechsler D. The Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence (WPPSI-III). San Antonio: The Psychological Corporation; 2002.
23.
Elliot LL, Clifton LA, Servi DG. Word frequency effects for a closed-set word identification task. Audiology, 1983; 22(3): 229–40.
24.
Byrne D. Word familiarity in speech perception testing of children. Australian J Audiol, 1983; 5(2): 77–80.
25.
Mendel LL, Danhauer JL. Test development and standardization. In: Mendel LL, Danhauer JL, editors. Speech Perception Assessment. San Diego: Singular; 1997, 7–15.
27.
French NR, Steinberg JC. Factors governing the intelligibility of speech sounds. J Acoust Soc Am, 1947; 19: 90–119.
28.
Silverstein B, Bilger RC, Hanley TD, Steer MD. The relative intelligibility of male and female talkers. J Educ Psychol, 1953; 44(7): 418–28.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
