Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
MUSICAL TRAINING INFLUENCES AUDITORY TEMPORAL
PROCESSING
1
Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN,
USA
Publication date: 2016-09-30
Corresponding author
Saravanan Elangovan
Saravanan Elangovan, Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA, e-mail: elangova@etsu.edu
Saravanan Elangovan, Department of Audiology and Speech-Language Pathology, East Tennessee State University, Johnson City, TN, USA, e-mail: elangova@etsu.edu
J Hear Sci 2016;6(3):36-44
KEYWORDS
musicauditory cortexphoneticsspeech perceptionauditory temporal processinggap detectioncategorical perceptionspeech recognition in noise
ABSTRACT
Background:
A link between musical expertise and auditory temporal processing abilities was examined.
Material and Methods:
Trained musicians (n=13) and non-musicians (n=12) were tested on speech tasks (phonetic identification, speech recognition in noise) and non-speech tasks (temporal gap detection).
Results:
Results indicated musicians had shorter between-channel gap detection thresholds and sharper phonetic identification functions, suggesting that perceptual reorganization following musical training assists basic temporal auditory processes.
Conclusions:
In general, our results provide a conceptual advance in understanding how musical training influences speech processing, an ability which, when impaired, can affect speech and reading competency.
A link between musical expertise and auditory temporal processing abilities was examined.
Material and Methods:
Trained musicians (n=13) and non-musicians (n=12) were tested on speech tasks (phonetic identification, speech recognition in noise) and non-speech tasks (temporal gap detection).
Results:
Results indicated musicians had shorter between-channel gap detection thresholds and sharper phonetic identification functions, suggesting that perceptual reorganization following musical training assists basic temporal auditory processes.
Conclusions:
In general, our results provide a conceptual advance in understanding how musical training influences speech processing, an ability which, when impaired, can affect speech and reading competency.
REFERENCES (58)
1.
Parbery-Clark A, Skoe E, Lam C, Kraus N. Musician enhancement for speech-in-noise. Ear Hear, 2009; 30: 653–61.
2.
Bishop-Liebler P, Welch G, Huss M, Thomson JM, Goswami U. Auditory temporal processing skills in musicians with dyslexia. Dyslexia, 2014; 20: 261–79.
3.
Strait DL, Kraus N, Parbery-Clark A, Ashley R. Musical experience shapes top-down auditory mechanisms: Evidence from masking and auditory attention performance. Hear Res, 2010; 261: 22–29.
4.
Beck DL, Chasin M (eds). Music and hearing loss (special edition). Hear Rev, 2014; 21(8): 4–40.
5.
Hornickel J, Skoe E, Nicol T, Zecker S, Kraus N. Subcortical differentiation of stop consonants relates to reading and speech-in-noise perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2009; 106: 13022–27.
6.
Zendel BR, Alain C. Musicians experience less age-related decline in central auditory processing. Psychol Aging, 2012; 27: 410–17.
7.
Gaser C, Schlaug G. Brain structures differ between musicians and non-musicians. J Neurosci, 2003; 23: 9240–45.
8.
Hyde KL1, Lerch J, Norton A, Forgeard M, Winner E, Evans AC et al. Musical training shapes structural brain development. J Neurosci, 2009; 29: 3019–25.
9.
Chandrasekaran B, Krishnan A, Gandour JT. Relative influence of musical and linguistic experience on early cortical processing of pitch contours. Brain Lang, 2009; 108: 1–9.
10.
Musacchia G, Strait D, Kraus N. Relationships between behavior, brainstem and cortical encoding of seen and heard speech in musicians and non-musicians. Hear Res, 2008; 241: 34–42.
11.
Wong PCM, Skoe E, Russo NM, Dees T, Kraus N. Musical experience shapes human brainstem encoding of linguistic pitch patterns. Nat Neurosci, 2007; 10: 420–22.
12.
George EM, Coch D. Music training and working memory: An ERP study. Neuropsychologia, 2011; 49: 1083–94.
13.
Pallesen KJ, Brattico E, Bailey CJ, Korvenoja A, Koivisto J, Gjedde A et al. Cognitive control in auditory working memory is enhanced in musicians. PLoS One, 2010; 5: e11120.
14.
Tierney AT, Bergeson-Dana TR, Pisoni DB. Effects of early musical experience on auditory sequence memory. Empir Musicol Rev, 2008; 3: 178–86.
15.
Soncini F, Costa MJ. Efeito da prática musical no reconhecimento da fala no silêncio e no ruído. Pró-Fono Rev Atualização Científica, 2006; 18: 161–70 [in Italian].
16.
Elmer S, Meyer M, Jäncke L. Neurofunctional and behavioral correlates of phonetic and temporal categorization in musically trained and untrained subjects. Cereb Cortex, 2012; 22: 650–58.
17.
Anderson S, Kraus N. Sensory-cognitive interaction in the neural encoding of speech in noise: A review. J Am Acad Audiol, 2010; 21: 575–85.
18.
Ott CG, Langer N, Oechslin MS, Meyer M, Jäncke L et al: Processing of voiced and unvoiced acoustic stimuli in musicians. Front Psychol, 2011; 2: 195.
19.
Besson M, Chobert J, Marie C. Transfer of training between music and speech: common processing, attention, and memory. Front Psychol, 2011; 2: 94.
20.
Gaab N, Tallal P, Kim H, Lakshminarayanan K, Archie JJ, Glover GH et al. Neural correlates of rapid spectrotemporal processing in musicians and nonmusicians. Ann NY Acad Sci, 2005; 1060: 82–88.
21.
Mishra SK, Panda MR, Herbert C. Enhanced auditory temporal gap detection in listeners with musical training. J Acoust Soc Am, 2014; 136: EL173–78.
22.
Elangovan S, Stuart A. Natural boundaries in gap detection are related to categorical perception of stop consonants. Ear Hear, 2008; 29: 761–74.
23.
Phillips DP, Taylor TL, Hall SE, Carr MM, Mossop JE. Detection of silent intervals between noises activating different perceptual channels: Some properties of “central” auditory gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 1997; 101: 3694–705.
24.
Phillips DP, Comeau M, Andrus JN. Auditory temporal gap detection in children with and without auditory processing disorder. J Am Acad Audiol, 2010; 21: 404–8.
25.
Phillips DP, Hall SE. Independence of frequency channels in auditory temporal gap detection. J Acoust Soc Am, 2000; 108: 2957–63.
26.
Phillips DP, Smith JC. Correlations among within-channel and between-channel auditory gap-detection thresholds in normal listeners. Perception, 2004; 33: 371–78.
27.
Walker KMM, Hall SE, Klein RM, Phillips DP. Development of perceptual correlates of reading performance. Brain Res, 2006; 1124: 126–41.
28.
Lister J, Besing J, Koehnke J. Effects of age and frequency disparity on gap discrimination. J Acoust Soc Am, 2002; 111: 2793–800.
29.
Stefanatos GA, Braitman LE, Madigan S. Fine grain temporal analysis in aphasia: Evidence from auditory gap detection. Neuropsychologia, 2007; 45: 1127–33.
30.
Ayotte J, Peretz I, Rousseau I, Bard C, Bojanowski M. Patterns of music agnosia associated with middle cerebral artery infarcts. Brain J Neurol, 2000; 123 (Pt 9): 1926–38.
31.
Ayotte J, Peretz I, Hyde K. Congenital amusia: A group study of adults afflicted with a music-specific disorder. Brain J Neurol, 2002; 125: 238–51.
32.
Kuhl PK, Williams KA, Lacerda F, Stevens KN, Lindblom B. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science, 1992; 255: 606–8.
33.
Sharma A, Marsh CM, Dorman MF. Relationship between N1 evoked potential morphology and the perception of voicing. J Acoust Soc Am, 2000; 108: 3030–35.
34.
Strouse A, Ashmead DH, Ohde RN, Grantham DW. Temporal processing in the aging auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 1998; 104: 2385–99.
35.
Tyler RS, Summerfield Q, Wood EJ, Fernandes MA. Psychoacoustic and phonetic temporal processing in normal and hearing-impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am, 1982; 72: 740–52.
36.
Sanju HK, Nikhil J, Kumar, P. Effect of carnatic vocal music training and experience on cortical auditory evoked potentials, J Hear Sci, 2016; 6: 40–47.
37.
Nikjeh DA, Lister JJ, Frisch SA. Hearing of note: An electrophysiologic and psychoacoustic comparison of pitch discrimination between vocal and instrumental musicians. Psychophysiol, 2008; 45: 994–1007.
38.
Shahin A, Bosnyak DJ, Trainor LJ, Roberts LE. Enhancement of neuroplastic P2 and N1c auditory evoked potentials in musicians. J Neurosci, 2003; 23: 5545–52.
39.
Fujioka T, Ross B, Kakigi R, Pantev C, Trainor LJ. One year of musical training affects development of auditory cortical-evoked fields in young children. Brain J Neurol, 2006; 129: 2593–608.
40.
Eimas PD, Siqueland ER, Jusczyk P, Vigorito J. Speech perception in infants. Science, 1971; 171: 303–6.
41.
Werker JF, Tees RC. Speech perception in severely disabled and average reading children. Can J Psychol, 1987; 41: 48–61.
42.
Werker JF, Tees RC. Speech perception as a window for understanding plasticity and commitment in language systems of the brain. Dev Psychobiol, 2005; 46: 233–51.
43.
Gordon-Salant S, Yeni-Komshian GH, Fitzgibbons PJ, Barrett J. Age-related differences in identification and discrimination of temporal cues in speech segments. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006; 119: 2455–66.
44.
Musacchia G, Sams M, Skoe E, Kraus N. Musicians have enhanced subcortical auditory and audiovisual processing of speech and music. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 2007; 104: 15894–98.
45.
Stuart A, Phillips DP. Word recognition in continuous and interrupted broadband noise by young normal-hearing, older normal-hearing, and presbyacusic listeners. Ear Hear, 1996; 17: 478–89.
46.
Shahin AJ. Neurophysiological influence of musical training on speech perception. Front Psychol, 2011; 2: 126.
47.
Ruggles DR, Freyman RL, Oxenham AJ. Influence of musical training on understanding voiced and whispered speech in noise. PloS One, 2014; 9: e86980.
48.
Boebinger D, Evans S, Rosen S, Lima CF, Manly T, Scott SK. Musicians and non-musicians are equally adept at perceiving masked speech. J Acoust Soc Am, 2015; 137: 378–87.
49.
Swaminathan J, Mason CR, Streeter TM, Best V, Kidd J Gerald, Patel AD. Musical training, individual differences and the cocktail party problem. Sci Rep, 2015; 5: 11628.
50.
Cervera TC, Soler MJ, Dasi C, Ruiz JC. Speech recognition and working memory capacity in young-elderly listeners: Effects of hearing sensitivity. Can J Exp Psychol Rev Can Psychol Exp, 2009; 63: 216–26.
51.
Parbery-Clark A, Strait DL, Anderson S, Hittner E, Kraus N. Musical experience and the aging auditory system: implications for cognitive abilities and hearing speech in noise. PloS One, 2011;6: e18082.
52.
Strait D, Kraus N. Playing music for a smarter ear: Cognitive, perceptual and neurobiological evidence. Music Percept, 2011; 29: 133–46.
53.
Wilson RH, McArdle RA, Smith SL. An evaluation of the BKBSIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2007; 50: 844–56.
54.
Strait DL, Parbery-Clark A, Hittner E, Kraus N. Musical training during early childhood enhances the neural encoding of speech in noise. Brain Lang, 2012; 123: 191–201.
55.
Wilson RH. Development of a speech-in-multitalker-babble paradigm to assess word-recognition performance. J Am Acad Audiol, 2003; 14: 453–70.
56.
Kraus N, Chandrasekaran B. Music training for the development of auditory skills. Nat Rev Neurosci, 2010; 11: 599–605.
58.
Abrams DA, Bhatara A, Ryali S, Balaban E, Levitin DJ, Menon V. Decoding temporal structure in music and speech relies on shared brain resources but elicits different fine-scale spatial patterns. Cereb Cortex, 2011; 21: 1507–18.
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
