Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
NORMATIVE VALUES OF NASAL RESONANCE: PRELIMINARY DATA FOR POLISH WORKING-AGE ADULTS
1
Audiology and Phoniatric Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
2
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Clinic, World Hearing Center, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw/Kajetany, Poland
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2023-05-25
Final revision date: 2023-10-25
Acceptance date: 2023-11-16
Online publication date: 2023-12-22
Publication date: 2023-12-22
Corresponding author
Paulina Krasnodębska
Audiology and Phoniatric Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland
Audiology and Phoniatric Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warsaw, Poland
J Hear Sci 2023;13(4):46-51
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Introduction:
Evaluation of nasal resonance is an important part of everyday otolaryngological, phoniatric, and speech therapy practice. It allows the detection and monitoring of anatomical and functional abnormalities in the nasal and oropharyngeal cavities. Nasal resonance can be objectively measured by assessing acoustic energy emitted by each of the subject’s nose and mouth. The ratio is called nasalance. The aim of this study was to develop normative values of nasal resonance on a digital device while adults were reading aloud Polish-language material.
Material and methods:
The study included 51 patients. Patients were tested with three language tests developed by Gąsiorek in 1996. Nasal resonance was measured using a Nasometer II (Model 6450) from Pentax Medical.
Results:
The mean nasalance in the vowel test was 18.8% (SD = 7.8%). The mean nasalance during the test based on sentences was 14.3% (SD = 4.0%), and for reading continuous text it was 11.7% (SD = 3.7%). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between men and women on each test. The limiting normative value for nasalance was determined to be 20% in the sentence test (test III of Gąsiorek 1996).
Conclusions:
1. Preliminary normative values of nasal resonance for Polish adults have been established based on current methodology. 2. Language tests developed and already in use can be applied to modern digital devices.
Evaluation of nasal resonance is an important part of everyday otolaryngological, phoniatric, and speech therapy practice. It allows the detection and monitoring of anatomical and functional abnormalities in the nasal and oropharyngeal cavities. Nasal resonance can be objectively measured by assessing acoustic energy emitted by each of the subject’s nose and mouth. The ratio is called nasalance. The aim of this study was to develop normative values of nasal resonance on a digital device while adults were reading aloud Polish-language material.
Material and methods:
The study included 51 patients. Patients were tested with three language tests developed by Gąsiorek in 1996. Nasal resonance was measured using a Nasometer II (Model 6450) from Pentax Medical.
Results:
The mean nasalance in the vowel test was 18.8% (SD = 7.8%). The mean nasalance during the test based on sentences was 14.3% (SD = 4.0%), and for reading continuous text it was 11.7% (SD = 3.7%). Statistical analysis showed no significant difference between men and women on each test. The limiting normative value for nasalance was determined to be 20% in the sentence test (test III of Gąsiorek 1996).
Conclusions:
1. Preliminary normative values of nasal resonance for Polish adults have been established based on current methodology. 2. Language tests developed and already in use can be applied to modern digital devices.
REFERENCES (21)
1.
Pruszewicz A, Obrębowski A. [Outline of clinical phoniatry]. Poznań: Uniwersytet Medyczny w Poznaniu; 2019 [in Polish].
2.
Selvaraj JL. Severe dysarthria due to hyponatremia and extrapontine demyelination: a single case study. J Hear Sci, 2021; 11(2): 71–4. https://doi.org/10.17430/JHS.2....
3.
Sinko K, Gruber M, Jagsch R, Roesner I, Baumann A, Wutzl A, Denk-Linnert D. Assessment of nasalance and nasality in patients with a repaired cleft palate. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2017; 274(7): 2845–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00405....
4.
Gąsiorek J, Pruszewicz A, Obrębowski A. [Verbal tests for nasal resonance testing]. Otolaryngol Pol, 1996; 4: 409–16 [in Polish].
5.
Domeracka-Kołodziej A, Maniecka-Aleksandrowicz B, Zielnik-Jurkiewicz B, Zawadzka R, Rakowska M, Różak-Komorowska A, et al. [Evaluation of nasalance and nasality in children before and after adenoidectomy or adenotonsilotomy]. Otolaryngology, 2007; 6(3): 135–41 [in Polish].
6.
Gąsiorek J, Pruszewicz A, Obrębowski A. [A device for objective assessment of open nasality with automatic recording]. Otolaryngol Pol, 1994; 48(4): 386–90 [in Polish].
7.
Krasnodębska P, Nikiel K, Będziński W, Milewska M, Szkiełkowska A, Miaśkiewicz B. [Digital measurement of nasal resonance in the adult Polish population]. Now Audiofonol, 2021; 10(2): 19–24 [in Polish]. https://doi.org/10.17431/10.2.....
8.
Fletcher SG, Adams LE, McCutcheon MJ. Cleft palate speech assessment through oral–nasal acoustic measures. In: Bzoch K, editor. Communicative Disorders Related to Cleft Lip and Palate. Boston: College Hill Press; 1989, 246–57.
9.
Mishima K, Sugii A, Yamada T, Imura H, Sugahara T. Dialectal and gender differences in nasalance scores in a Japanese population. J Craniomaxillofac Surg, 2008; 36(1): 8–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcms....
10.
Lorenc A, Król D, Klessa K. An acoustic camera approach to studying nasality in speech: the case of Polish nasalized vowels. J Acoust Soc Am, 2018; 144(6): 3603–17. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.5084....
11.
Woo ST, Park YB, Oh DH, Ha JW. Influence of the nasometric instrument structure on nasalance score. Appl Sci, 2019; 9(15): 3040. https://doi.org/10.3390/app915....
12.
Alfwaress F, Kummer AW, Weinrich B. Nasalance scores for normal speakers of American English obtained by the Nasometer II using the MacKay–Kummer SNAP-R Test. Cleft Palate Craniofacial J, 2021; 59(6): 10556656211025406. https://doi.org/10.1177/105566....
13.
Bae Y, Lee S, Velik K, Liu Y, Beck C, Fox R. Differences in nasalance and nasality perception between Texas South and Midland dialects. J Acoust Soc Am, 2020; 147(1): 568–78. https://doi.org/10.1121/10.000....
14.
Wiskirska-Woźnica B. [Objectification possibilities of the phoniatric examination in speech disorders]. Otorynolaryngology, 2014; 13(3): 127–30 [in Polish].
15.
Mik Ł, Lorenc A, Król D, Wielgat R, Święciński R, Jędryka R. Fusing the electromagnetic articulograph, high-speed video cameras and a 16-channel microphone array for speech analysis. Bull Pol Acad Sci Tech Sci, 2018; 66(3). https://doi.org/10.24425/12210...
16.
Watterson T. The use of the nasometer and interpretation of nasalance scores. Perspectives of the ASHA Special Interest Groups, 2020; 5(1): 155–63. https://doi.org/10.1044/2019_P....
17.
Xu J, Kang Y, Park S, Yoon Y, Bai S, De Jin Y, et al. Nasality changes with age in normal Korean-speaking adults. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol, 2019; 12(1): 95. https://doi.org/10.21053/ceo.2....
18.
Natour Y, Efthymiou E, Marie B, Darawsheh W. Quantifying nasality in Arabic speakers: preliminary data. IJAES, 2020; 20(2): 99–114. https://doi.org/10.33806/ijaes....
19.
Nguyen VT, Lehes L, Truong TTH, Hoang TVA, Jagomägi T. Normative nasalance scores for Vietnamese-speaking children. Logoped Phoniatr Vocol, 2019; 44(2): 51–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/140154...
20.
Murray E, Mendoza J, Gill S, Perkell J, Stepp C. Effects of biofeedback on control and generalization of nasalization in typical speakers. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2016; 59(5): 1025–34. https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_J....
21.
Stadler M, Hersh C. Nasometry, videofluoroscopy, and the speech pathologist’s evaluation and treatment. In: Surgery for Pediatric Velopharyngeal Insufficiency. Raol N, Hartnick CJ, editors. Basel: Karger Publishers; 2015; 76: 7–17. https://doi.org/10.1159/isbn.9....
Share
RELATED ARTICLE
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
