ORIGINAL ARTICLE
OUTCOMES OF COCHLEAR IMPLANTATION IN PRELINGUAL HEARING IMPAIRED CHILDREN WITH ABNORMAL PREIMPLANTATION IMAGING FINDINGS
 
More details
Hide details
1
Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Malaysia
 
 
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
 
 
Publication date: 2021-03-31
 
 
Corresponding author
Khairunnisak Misron   

Otorhinolaryngology, Hospital Sultan Ismail, Jalan Mutiara Emas Utama, 81100, Johor Bahru, Malaysia
 
 
J Hear Sci 2021;11(1):40-45
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
In pediatric patients who are about to undergo cochlear implantation, preimplantation imaging to assess any abnormality in the inner ear or brain is crucial. The literature has shown that inner ear malformation affects auditory and speech development. The objective of this study was to analyze the outcomes of cochlear implant (CI) in children with abnormal imaging findings.

Material and methods:
All children had undergone high resolution computed tomography (HRCT) of the temporal bone and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the internal acoustic canal and brain as part of routine preimplantation evaluations. Outcomes of CI were measured using Category of Auditory Performance II (CAP-II) and Meaningful Auditory Integration Scale (MAIS).

Results:
There were 25 patients who initially underwent unilateral CI, but 2 patients were excluded, leaving 23 patients in the study. There were 4 patients who had inner ear malformations and another 3 presented with brain findings, while the remaining 16 children had normal findings. In both prelingual hearing impaired children with abnormal and normal imaging findings, there were significant improvements in CAP-II score following CI (p = 0.020 and p = 0.002, respectively). Similarly, there were statistically significant in MAIS scores in prelingual hearing impaired children with abnormal imaging (p = 0.017) as well as with normal imaging (p = 0.001). However, when comparing the CAP-II and MAIS scores between children with normal and abnormal imaging, there were no significant differences observed (p = 0.624 and p = 0.376, respectively).

Conclusions:
This study demonstrated that prelingually hearing impaired children with abnormal HRCT and MRI findings gained benefits from CI. Therefore, abnormal imaging findings should not be a limiting factor in CI candidacy.

 
REFERENCES (17)
1.
Simons JP, Healy GB Bluestone CD (eds). Bluestone and Stool’s Paediatric Otolaryngology: Congenital inner ear anomalies. USA, People’s Medical Publishing House, 2014.
 
2.
Swami H, James E, Sabrigirish K et al. A study to determine factors influencing outcomes of paediatric cochlear implants. Med J Armed Forces India, 2013; 69(4): 366–8.
 
3.
Busi M, Rosignoli M, Castiglione A et al. Cochlear implant outcomes and genetic mutations in children with ear and brain anomalies. BioMed Res Int, 2015; 2015: 696281.
 
4.
Papsin BC. Cochlear implantation in children with anomalous cochleovestibular anatomy. Laryngoscope, 2009; 115: S106.
 
5.
Moon IJ, Kim EY, Park GY et al. The clinical significance of preoperative brain magnetic resonance imaging in paediatric cochlear implant recipients. Audiol Neurotol, 2012; 17(6): 373–80.
 
6.
Tay SY, Anicette R, Tan KKH. A ten-year review of audiological performance in children with inner ear abnormalities after cochlear implantation in Singapore. Int J Otolaryngol, 2019: 6483714.
 
7.
Archbold S, Lutman ME, Marshall DH. Categories of auditory performance. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol Suppl, 1995; 166: 312–4.
 
8.
Robbins AM, Renshaw JJ, Berry SW. Evaluating meaningful auditory integration in profoundly hearing-impaired children. Am J Otolaryngol, 1991; 12: 144–50.
 
9.
Xu XQ, Wu FY, Hu H et al. Incidence of brain abnormalities detected on preoperative brain MR imaging and their effect on the outcome of cochlear implantation in children with sensorineural hearing loss. Int J Biomed Imaging, 2015; 2015: 275786.
 
10.
Siu JM, Blaser SI, Gordon KA et al. Efficacy of a selective imaging paradigm prior to paediatric cochlear implantation. Laryngoscope, 2019; 129(11): 2627–33.
 
11.
Young JY, Ryan ME, Young NM. Preoperative imaging sensorineural hearing loss in paediatric candidates for cochlear implantation. RadioGraphics, 2014; 34(5); e133–e149.
 
12.
Hanafi MG, Saki N, Shanehsaz F. Diagnostic value of CT and MRI of temporal bone in cochlear implantation candidates. Int J Paediatr, 2019; 7(7): 9693–700.
 
13.
Digge P, Solanki RN, Shah DC et al. Imaging modality of choice for pre-operative cochlear imaging: HRCT vs MRI temporal bone. J Clin Diagn Res, 2016; 10(10): TC01–TC04.
 
14.
Taha T, Eahba S,Ibrahim AS et al. Cochlear implant tailored imaging protocol: what clinicians need to know. Egypt J Radiol Nucl Med, 2015; 46(1): 33–43.
 
15.
Vincenti V, Bacciu A, Guida M et al. Paediatric cochlear implantation: an update. Ital J Paediatr, 2014; 40: 72.
 
16.
Han JJ, Bae YJ, Song SK et al. Prediction of the outcome of cochlear implantation in the patients with congenital cymtomegalovirus infection based on magnetic resonance imaging characteristics. J Clin Med, 2019; 8(2): 136.
 
17.
Dettmann S, Sadeghi-Barzalighi A, Ambett R et al. Cochlear implants in forty-eight children with cochlear and/or vestibular abnormality. Audiol Neurotol, 2011; 16: 222–32.
 
Journals System - logo
Scroll to top