Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
CASE STUDY
POSTLINGUAL SENSORINEURAL HEARING LOSS DUE TO KNOWN TBC1D24 GENE ALTERATION
1
Department of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
2
Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Poland
3
Oto-Rhino-Laryngology Surgery Clinic, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Poland
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2021-05-28
Final revision date: 2021-08-12
Acceptance date: 2021-08-13
Publication date: 2022-03-01
Corresponding author
Monika Ołdak
Department of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, M. Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warszawa, Poland
Department of Genetics, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, M. Mochnackiego 10, 02-042, Warszawa, Poland
J Hear Sci 2021;11(4):72-76
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Genetically determined hearing loss (HL) can be inherited in two major ways - autosomal recessive or dominant. Autosomal dominant hearing loss (ADHL) is usually postlingual and progressive. To date, 50 different genes have been demonstrated to be causally involved in its development. In Polish ADHL patients, TBC1D24 pathogenic variants are a frequent cause of the disease.
Case report:
A three-generation Polish family with ADHL was recruited for the study. An audiological assessment was conducted and next- generation sequencing of a custom HL multigene panel (n = 237 genes) was performed in the index patient. The presence and segregation of the detected variant with HL was verified by Sanger sequencing. All affected individuals had postlingual progressive HL, mainly affecting high frequencies. In this study, a very rare previously reported p.Ser178Leu variant in TBC1D24 was identified in all family members with HL.
Conclusions:
Our study provides an independent confirmation of the pathogenic role of TBC1D24 p.Ser178Leu in HL. In individuals with ADHL-related TBC1D24 pathogenic variants, the cochlear component of the auditory system is affected. Patients may also report tinnitus but usually do not complain of vertigo
Genetically determined hearing loss (HL) can be inherited in two major ways - autosomal recessive or dominant. Autosomal dominant hearing loss (ADHL) is usually postlingual and progressive. To date, 50 different genes have been demonstrated to be causally involved in its development. In Polish ADHL patients, TBC1D24 pathogenic variants are a frequent cause of the disease.
Case report:
A three-generation Polish family with ADHL was recruited for the study. An audiological assessment was conducted and next- generation sequencing of a custom HL multigene panel (n = 237 genes) was performed in the index patient. The presence and segregation of the detected variant with HL was verified by Sanger sequencing. All affected individuals had postlingual progressive HL, mainly affecting high frequencies. In this study, a very rare previously reported p.Ser178Leu variant in TBC1D24 was identified in all family members with HL.
Conclusions:
Our study provides an independent confirmation of the pathogenic role of TBC1D24 p.Ser178Leu in HL. In individuals with ADHL-related TBC1D24 pathogenic variants, the cochlear component of the auditory system is affected. Patients may also report tinnitus but usually do not complain of vertigo
REFERENCES (25)
1.
Korver AM, Smith RJ, Van Camp G, Schleiss MR, Bitner- Glindzicz MA, Lustig LR et al. Congenital hearing loss. Nat Rev Dis Primers, 2017; 3: 16094.
2.
Smith RJH, Shearer AE, Hildebrand MS. Deafness and Hereditary Hearing Loss Overview 1999 [updated 2017 July 27. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/bo....
3.
Falace A, Filipello F, La Padula V, Vanni N, Madia F, De Pietri Tonelli D et al. TBC1D24, an ARF6-interacting protein, is mutated in familial infantile myoclonic epilepsy. Am J Hum Genet, 2010; 87(3): 365–70.
4.
Campeau PM, Kasperaviciute D, Lu JT, Burrage LC, Kim C, Hori M et al. The genetic basis of DOORS syndrome: an exomesequencing study. Lancet Neurol, 2014; 13(1): 44–58.
5.
Sheehan P, Waites CL. Coordination of synaptic vesicle trafficking and turnover by the Rab35 signaling network. Small GTPases, 2019; 10(1): 54–63.
6.
Finelli MJ, Oliver PL. TLDc proteins: new players in the oxidative stress response and neurological disease. Mamm Genome, 2017; 28(9-10): 395–406.
7.
Recommended procedure for pure-tone bone-conduction audiometry without masking using a manually operated instrument [Technical note]. Br J Audiol, 1985; 19(4): 281–2.
8.
Ozieblo D, Pazik J, Stepniak I, Skarzynski H, Oldak M. Two novel pathogenic variants confirm RMND1 causative role in Perrault syndrome with renal involvement. Genes (Basel), 2020; 11(9): 1060.
9.
Robinson JT, Thorvaldsdottir H, Winckler W, Guttman M, Lander ES, Getz G et al. Integrative genomics viewer. Nat Biotechnol, 2011; 29(1): 24–6.
10.
Kumar P, Henikoff S, Ng PC. Predicting the effects of coding non-synonymous variants on protein function using the SIFT algorithm. Nat Protoc, 2009; 4(7): 1073–81.
11.
Adzhubei I, Jordan DM, Sunyaev SR. Predicting functional effect of human missense mutations using PolyPhen-2. Curr Protoc Hum Genet, 2013; Chapter 7: Unit 7 20.
12.
Schwarz JM, Cooper DN, Schuelke M, Seelow D. MutationTaster2: mutation prediction for the deep-sequencing age. Nat Methods, 2014; 11(4): 361–2.
13.
Chun S, Fay JC. Identification of deleterious mutations within three human genomes. Genome Res, 2009; 19(9): 1553–61.
14.
Rentzsch P, Witten D, Cooper GM, Shendure J, Kircher M. CADD: predicting the deleteriousness of variants throughout the human genome. Nucleic Acids Res, 2019; 47(D1): D886–D894.
15.
Ioannidis NM, Rothstein JH, Pejaver V, Middha S, McDonnell SK, Baheti S et al. REVEL: an ensemble method for predicting the pathogenicity of rare missense variants. Am J Hum Genet, 2016; 99(4): 877–85.
16.
Jaganathan K, Kyriazopoulou Panagiotopoulou S, McRae JF, Darbandi SF, Knowles D, Li YI et al. Predicting splicing from primary sequence with deep learning. Cell, 2019; 176(3): 535–48.e24.
17.
Davydov EV, Goode DL, Sirota M, Cooper GM, Sidow A, Batzoglou S. Identifying a high fraction of the human genome to be under selective constraint using GERP++. PLoS Comput Biol, 2010; 6(12): e1001025.
18.
Papadopoulos JS, Agarwala R. COBALT: constraint-based alignment tool for multiple protein sequences. Bioinformatics, 2007; 23(9): 1073–9.
19.
Waterhouse AM, Procter JB, Martin DM, Clamp M, Barton GJ. Jalview Version 2: a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench. Bioinformatics, 2009; 25(9): 1189–91.
20.
Azaiez H, Booth KT, Bu F, Huygen P, Shibata SB, Shearer AE et al. TBC1D24 mutation causes autosomal-dominant nonsyndromic hearing loss. Hum Mutat, 2014; 35(7): 819–23.
21.
Zhang L, Hu L, Chai Y, Pang X, Yang T, Wu H. A dominant mutation in the stereocilia-expressing gene TBC1D24 is a probable cause for nonsyndromic hearing impairment. Hum Mutat, 2014; 35(7): 814–8.
22.
Ozieblo D, Leja ML, Lazniewski M, Sarosiak A, Tacikowska G, Kochanek K et al. TBC1D24 emerges as an important contributor to progressive postlingual dominant hearing loss. Sci Rep, 2021; 11: 10300.
23.
Parzefall T, Frohne A, Koenighofer M, Neesen J, Laccone F, Eckl-Dorna J et al. A novel variant in the TBC1D24 lipid-binding pocket causes autosomal dominant hearing loss: evidence for a genotype–phenotype correlation. Front Cell Neurosci, 2020; 14: 585669.
24.
Oza AM, DiStefano MT, Hemphill SE, Cushman BJ, Grant AR, Siegert RK et al. Expert specification of the ACMG/AMP variant interpretation guidelines for genetic hearing loss. Hum Mutat, 2018; 39(11): 1593–613.
25.
Shearer AE, Smith RJ. Massively parallel sequencing for genetic diagnosis of hearing loss: the new standard of care. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, 2015; 153(2): 175–82.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
