Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
CASE STUDY
QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE AND FREQUENCY FOLLOWING RESPONSE IN TWO DYSARTHRIC SUBJECTS WITH NEURODEGENERATIVE DISEASE: A CASE STUDY
1
Departamento de Fonoaudiologia,, Universidade Federal de Santa Maria, Santa Maria / RS, Brazil
2
Otorh, Institute of Physiology and Pathology of Hearing, Warsaw, Poland;, Poland
3
Department of Heart Failure and Cardiac Rehabilitation,, Medical University of Warsaw,, Poland
4
Electrophysiology, Centro de Eletrofisiologia e Neuroaudiologia Avançada, Brazil
5
Audiology, Postgraduate Professor, Instituto Israelista de Ensino e Pesquisa do Hospital Israelista Albert Einstein, Brazil
A - Research concept and design; B - Collection and/or assembly of data; C - Data analysis and interpretation; D - Writing the article; E - Critical revision of the article; F - Final approval of article;
Submission date: 2022-05-26
Final revision date: 2022-08-03
Acceptance date: 2022-08-30
Publication date: 2022-09-30
Corresponding author
Milaine Dominici Sanfins
Electrophysiology, Centro de Eletrofisiologia e Neuroaudiologia Avançada, Avenida Jacutinga, 220- apto 12,, 04515-030, São Paulo, Brazil
Electrophysiology, Centro de Eletrofisiologia e Neuroaudiologia Avançada, Avenida Jacutinga, 220- apto 12,, 04515-030, São Paulo, Brazil
J Hear Sci 2022;12(3):57-63
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Background:
Effective speech production involves a complex system that not only requires planning and motor execution in different speech subsystems, but also depends on the proper functioning of the auditory system. In cases of dysarthria, auditory electrophysiological assessment can be important, since it can help diagnose the underlying neurological disease. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of the frequency-following response (FFR) in monitoring the progress of speech therapy in cases of dysarthria due to neurodegenerative disease. It also sought to gauge changes in the patients’ quality of life using a self-report questionnaire.
Case report:
Two individuals with dysarthria were assessed by the FFR and by the questionnaire “Living with Dysarthria” while undergoing a speech therapy rehabilitation program aimed at improving their speech. It was found that the speech therapy brought benefits in terms of quality of life, in line with the FFR responses.
Conclusions:
The FFR may be a promising approach to monitoring changes in the central auditory nervous system during speech therapy for dysarthria due to acquired neurodegenerative disease.
Effective speech production involves a complex system that not only requires planning and motor execution in different speech subsystems, but also depends on the proper functioning of the auditory system. In cases of dysarthria, auditory electrophysiological assessment can be important, since it can help diagnose the underlying neurological disease. The objective of this pilot study was to assess the effectiveness of the frequency-following response (FFR) in monitoring the progress of speech therapy in cases of dysarthria due to neurodegenerative disease. It also sought to gauge changes in the patients’ quality of life using a self-report questionnaire.
Case report:
Two individuals with dysarthria were assessed by the FFR and by the questionnaire “Living with Dysarthria” while undergoing a speech therapy rehabilitation program aimed at improving their speech. It was found that the speech therapy brought benefits in terms of quality of life, in line with the FFR responses.
Conclusions:
The FFR may be a promising approach to monitoring changes in the central auditory nervous system during speech therapy for dysarthria due to acquired neurodegenerative disease.
REFERENCES (26)
1.
Singh S, Gupta SK, Seth PK. Biomarkers for detection, prognosis and therapeutic assessment of neurological disorders. Rev Neurosci, 2018; 29(7): 771–89.
2.
Schalling E, Gustafsson J, Ternström S, Wilén FB, Södersten M. Effects of tactile biofeedback by a portable voice accumulator on voice sound level in speakers with Parkinson’s disease. J Voice, 2013; 27(6): 729–37.
3.
Arnold C, Gehrig J, Gispert S, Seifried C, Kell CA. Pathomecha-nisms and compensatory efforts related to Parkinsonian speech. Neuroimage Clin, 2014; 4(1): 82–97.
4.
Darley FL, Aronson AE, Brown JR. Differential diagnostic patterns of dysarthria. J Speech Hear Res, 1969; 12(2): 246–69.
5.
Portalete CR, Urrutia GAU, Pagliarin KC, Keske-Soares M. Tratamento motor da fala na disartria flácida: um estudo de caso. Audiol Commun Res, 2019; 24: 2118.
6.
Basilakos A, Yourganov G, Den ouden DB, Fogerty D, Rorden C, Feenaughty L, Fridriksson J. A multivariate analytic approach to the differential diagnosis of apraxia of speech. J Speech Lang Hear Res, 2017; 60: 3378–92.
7.
Crum EO, Baltz MJ, Krause DA. The use of motor learning and neural plasticity in rehabilitation for ataxic hemiparesis: a case report. Physiother Theory Pract, 2020; 36(11): 1256–65.
8.
Rech RS, Neves F, Jeanne H, Schmidt G, Goulart BNG, Higert JB. Speech-language therapy offer and primary health care in Brazil: an analysis based on socioeconomic development. CoDAS, 2019; 31(1): 20180083.
9.
Sanfins MD, Borges LR, Ubiali T, Colella-Santos MF. Speech auditory brainstem response (speech ABR) in the differential diagnosis of scholastic difficulties. Braz J Otorhinolaryngol, 2017; 83(1): 112–16.
10.
Jafari Z, Malayeri S. Subcortical encoding of speech cues in children with congenital blindness. Restor Neurol Neurosci, 2016; 34(5): 757–68.
11.
Skoe E, Krizman J, Anderson S, Kraus N. Stability and plasticity of auditory brainstem function across the lifespan. Cereb Cortex, 2015; 25(6): 1415–26.
12.
Puhl AE, Diaféria G, Padovani MM, Behlau MS. Living with dysarthria self-reported questionnaire in Parkinson’s disease. In: Proceedings of the 28th IALP Congress; 2010; Athens, Greece. Athens: Panhellenic Association of Logopedists; 2010.
14.
Jerger J. Clinical experience with impedance audiometry. Arch Otolaryngol, 1970; 92: 311–24.
15.
Song JH, Nicol T, Kraus N. Test–retest reliability of the speech-evoked auditory brainstem response. Clin Neurophysiol, 2011; 122(2): 346–55.
16.
Coffey E, Nicol T, White-Schwoch T, et al. Evolving perspectives on the sources of the frequency-following response. Nat Comm, 2019; 10: 5036.
17.
Ahadi M, Pourbakht A, Jafari AH, Jalaie S. Effects of stimulus presentation mode and subcortical laterality in speech-evoked auditory brainstem responses. Int J Audiol, 2014; 53(4): 243–9.
18.
World Health Organization. UN Decade of Healthy Ageing 2021–2030. Available at https://www.who.int/initiative.... Accessed 2022 Sept 20.
19.
Weil RS, Costantini AA, Schrag AE. Mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s Disease: what is it? Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep, 2018; 18(4): 17.
20.
Zucchi E, Ticozzi N, Mandrioli J. Psychiatric symptoms in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis: beyond a motor neuron disorder. Front Neurosci, 2019; 13: 175.
21.
Feenaughty L, Tjaden K, Weinstock-Guttman B, Benedict RHB. Separate and combined influence of cognitive impairment and dysarthria on functional communication in multiple sclerosis. Am J Speech Lang Pathol, 2018; 27(3): 1051–65.
22.
Lirani-Silva C, Mourão LF, Gobbi LT. Dysarthria and quality of life in neurologically healthy elderly and patients with Parkinson’s disease. CoDAS, 2015; 27(3): 248–54.
23.
Ferrazoli N, Donadon C, Rezende A, Skarzynski P, Sanfins M. The application of P300 long latency auditory evoked potential in Parkinson disease. Int Arch Otorhinolaryngol, 2021; 26(1): e158–e166.
24.
Iyer PM, Mohr K, Broderick M, Gavin B, Burke T, Bede P, et al. Mismatch negativity as an indicator of cognitive sub-domain dysfunction in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Front Neurol, 2017; 8: 395.
25.
Marques MCS, Griz S, Lira de Andrade KC, Menezes PL, Menezes DC. Frequency following responses in childhood apraxia of speech. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol, 2021; 145: 110742.
26.
Sanfins MD, Skarzynski PH. Auditory Electrophysiology: part 1 (Basic concepts). Cena News, 2022; 26: 1–6. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.....
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
