Current Issue
Volumes and Issues
For Authors
Manuscript Guidelines
Review Process
Conflict of Interest
Copyright
About the Journal
Editorial Board
Aim and Scope
Policy and Ethical Guidelines
Promotion of the Journal
Print-Version Subscription
Publisher and Contact Information
Contact Information
Sign in as an AUTHOR/REVIEWER
ORIGINAL ARTICLE
SPECTRAL KURTOSIS OF OTOACOUSTIC EMISSIONS USING
THE HUSIMI TRANSFORM: A PILOT STUDY
1
Department of Biophysics and Human Physiology, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
2
Interdisciplinary Centre for Mathematical and Computational Modelling, University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
Publication date: 2015-12-31
Corresponding author
Tomasz I. Siedlecki
Tomasz Siedlecki, Department of Biophysics and Human Physiology, Warsaw Medical University, Chalubinskiego 5 Str., 02-004 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: tsiedlecki@wum.edu.pl
Tomasz Siedlecki, Department of Biophysics and Human Physiology, Warsaw Medical University, Chalubinskiego 5 Str., 02-004 Warsaw, Poland, e-mail: tsiedlecki@wum.edu.pl
J Hear Sci 2015;5(4):15-25
KEYWORDS
spontaneous otoacoustic emissionsprobabilitykurtosisevoked otoacoustic emissionsstatistical distributionsmomentsstimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions
ABSTRACT
Background:
Time-frequency distributions can help reveal resonant modes of OAEs. The Husimi transform is the time-frequency distribution of probability. The sound pressure probability density function for a given frequency can be derived from the Husimi transform. Using the Husimi transform as the weight function, it is possible to define the spectral kurtosis of OAEs.
Material and Methods:
The Husimi transform was calculated numerically from OAE data recorded from subjects with normal hearing. We examined click-evoked OAEs (CEOAEs) and tone-burst-evoked OAEs (TBOAEs) with stimuli centered at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and the presence of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs) was also investigated. The aim of this study was to examine the statistical properties of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and relate them to resonant modes of the cochlea. Assuming that the probability of the sound pressure of an OAE at any time and frequency is given by a Husimi-type transform, we analyzed statistical features of the probability distribution, particularly spectral kurtosis.
Results:
With evoked OAEs, a minimum in kurtosis was found at frequencies close to SOAEs. With TBOAEs, three sorts of SOAEs were found: those with high positive kurtosis, those with small positive kurtosis, and those with negative kurtosis; in these cases, SOAEs appeared at the same frequency as the kurtosis minimum.
Conclusions:
The kurtosis of evoked components of an OAE is strongly affected by the presence of an SOAE. The number of positive peaks and negative troughs of spectral kurtosis in a given frequency band seem to be characteristic of each subject. It is suggested that a new way of distinguishing types of OAEs may involve calculating the spectral kurtosis, and this may be diagnostically useful.
Time-frequency distributions can help reveal resonant modes of OAEs. The Husimi transform is the time-frequency distribution of probability. The sound pressure probability density function for a given frequency can be derived from the Husimi transform. Using the Husimi transform as the weight function, it is possible to define the spectral kurtosis of OAEs.
Material and Methods:
The Husimi transform was calculated numerically from OAE data recorded from subjects with normal hearing. We examined click-evoked OAEs (CEOAEs) and tone-burst-evoked OAEs (TBOAEs) with stimuli centered at 1, 2, and 4 kHz, and the presence of spontaneous OAEs (SOAEs) was also investigated. The aim of this study was to examine the statistical properties of otoacoustic emissions (OAEs) and relate them to resonant modes of the cochlea. Assuming that the probability of the sound pressure of an OAE at any time and frequency is given by a Husimi-type transform, we analyzed statistical features of the probability distribution, particularly spectral kurtosis.
Results:
With evoked OAEs, a minimum in kurtosis was found at frequencies close to SOAEs. With TBOAEs, three sorts of SOAEs were found: those with high positive kurtosis, those with small positive kurtosis, and those with negative kurtosis; in these cases, SOAEs appeared at the same frequency as the kurtosis minimum.
Conclusions:
The kurtosis of evoked components of an OAE is strongly affected by the presence of an SOAE. The number of positive peaks and negative troughs of spectral kurtosis in a given frequency band seem to be characteristic of each subject. It is suggested that a new way of distinguishing types of OAEs may involve calculating the spectral kurtosis, and this may be diagnostically useful.
REFERENCES (23)
1.
Kemp DT. Stimulated emission from within the human auditory system. J Acoust Soc Am, 1978; 64: 1386–91.
2.
Jedrzejczak WW, Bell A, Skarzynski PH, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. Time-frequency analysis of linear and nonlinear otoacoustic emissions and removal of a short-latency stimulus artifact. J Acoust Soc Am, 2012; 131(3): 2200–8.
3.
Jedrzejczak WW, Blinowska KJ, Kochanek W, Skarzynski H. Synchronized spontaneous otoacoustic emissions analyzed in a time-frequency domain. J Acoust Soc Am, 2008; 124(6): 3720–9.
4.
Jedrzejczak WW, Kwaskiewicz K, Blinowska K, Kochanek K, Skarzynski H. Use of matching pursuit algorithm with a dictionary of asymmetric waveforms in the analysis of transient evoked optoacoustic emissions. J Acoust Soc Am, 2009; 126(6): 3137–46.
5.
Kuttig H, Niethammer M, Hurlebaus S, Jacobs L. Model-based analysis of dispersion curves using chirplets. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006; 119(4): 2122–31.
6.
Martin W, Flandrin P. Wigner-Ville spectral analysis of nonstationary processes. IEEE Transactions on Acoustics Speech and Signal Processing, 1985; 33(6): 1461–70.
7.
Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Time-frequency distributions of click evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res, 1997;106: 112−22.
8.
Jedrzejczak WW, Blinowska KJ, Konopka W, Grzanka A, Durka PJ. Identification of otoacoustic emissions components by means of adaptive approximations. J Acoust Soc Am, 2004; 115(5): 2148–58.
9.
Keefe DH. Moments of click-evoked emissions in human ears: group delay and spread, instantaneous frequency and bandwidth. J Acoust Soc Am, 2012; 132(5): 3319–50.
10.
Wable J, Collet L. Can synchronized optoacoustic emissions really be attributed to SOAEs? Hear Res, 1994; 80: 141–5.
11.
Gold T, Hearing II. The physical basis of the action of the cochlea. Proc R Soc Lond B, 1948; 135: 492–8.
12.
Fruth F, Julicher F, Lindner B. An active oscillator model describes the statistics of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions. Biophys J, 2014; 107: 815–24.
13.
Zweig G. Finding the impedance of the organ of Corti. J Acoust Soc Am, 1991; 89(3): 1229–54.
14.
Shera C. Laser amplification with a twist: travelling-wave propagation and gain functions from throughout the cochlea. J Acoust Soc Am, 2007; 122(5): 3738–58.
15.
Sisto R, Moleti A. Modeling otoacoustic emissions by active nonlinear oscillators. J Acoust Soc Am, 1999; 106(4): 1893–906.
16.
Sisto R, Moleti A, Lucertini M. Spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and relaxation dynamics of long decay time OAEs in audiologically normal and impaired subjects. J Acoust Soc Am, 2001; 109(2): 638–47.
17.
Husimi K. Miscellanea in elementary quantum mechanics, II. Progress of Theoretical Physics, 1953; 9(4): 381–402.
18.
Bialek W, Wit HP. Quantum limits to oscillator stability. Theory and experiments on acoustic emissions from the human ear. Physics Letters, 1984; 104A, 3: 173–8.
19.
Martin P, Hudspeth AJ, Julicher F. Comparison of a hair bundle’s spontaneous oscillation with the response to mechanical stimulus reveals the underlying active process. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA, 2001; 118(25): 14380–5.
20.
Antoni J. The spectral kurtosis: a useful tool for characterizing non-stationary signals. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2006; 20: 282–307.
21.
Davidovic MD, Davidovic MD, Vojisavljevic V. Time-frequency analysis of nonstationary optical signals using Husimi type function. Acta Physica Polonica, 2009; 116(4): 675–7.
22.
Jedrzejczak WW, Blinowska KJ, Konopka W. Resonant modes in transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions and asymmetries between left and right ear. J Acoust Soc Am, 2006; 119: 2226–31.
23.
Bergevin C, Fulcher A, Richmond S, Velenovsky D Lee J. Interrelationship between spontaneous and low-level stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions in humans. Hear Res, 2012; 285: 20–8.
We process personal data collected when visiting the website. The function of obtaining information about users and their behavior is carried out by voluntarily entered information in forms and saving cookies in end devices. Data, including cookies, are used to provide services, improve the user experience and to analyze the traffic in accordance with the Privacy policy. Data are also collected and processed by Google Analytics tool (more).
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
You can change cookies settings in your browser. Restricted use of cookies in the browser configuration may affect some functionalities of the website.
